7.1.6 Non-Linear Eddy Viscosity 非线性涡黏性[cfd-7-1-6]
为了消除湍流与平均应变率之间平衡假设所强加的限制,Lumley[22]、[23]提议用应变张量与旋转张量的高阶乘积来扩展线性的Boussinesq方法。这可以视为一种Taylor级数展开。沿着Lumley的思路,人们提出了众多非线性涡黏性模型,例如文献[24]–[29]。en
In order to remove the restrictions imposed by the assumption of equilibrium between the turbulence and the mean strain rate, Lumley [22], [23] proposed to extend the linear Boussinesq approach by higher-order products of strain and rotation tensors. This can viewed as a Taylor series expansion. Following the idea of Lumley, numerous non-linear eddy-viscosity models were proposed, see, for example, Refs. [24]--[29].
下面我们介绍由Shih等人[25]提出的一种较新的方法。它在一般涡黏性表述中包含直至三阶的项,特别适合于旋转流(swirling flows)。正如文献[19]第194页所指出的,三次项对高精度至关重要。雷诺应力\(\tau^R_{ij}\)可以表示为[25]、[30](对照式(7.24))en
In the following, we shall present one recent approach proposed by Shih et al. [25]. It includes up to third-order terms in the general eddy-viscosity formulation and is particularly suited to swirling flows. As already pointed out in [19], p. 194, cubic terms are essential for high accuracy. The Reynolds stresses \(\tau^R_{ij}\) can be expressed as [25], [30] (cf. Eq. (7.24))
湍动能\(K\)和耗散率(dissipation rate)\(\varepsilon\)的值由低雷诺数\(K\)-\(\varepsilon\)湍流模型给出(参见7.2.2小节)。式(7.30)中的系数\(C_1\)至\(C_5\)见文献[25]、[30]。en
The values of the turbulent kinetic energy \(K\) and the dissipation rate \(\varepsilon\) are obtained from low-Reynolds \(K\)-\(\varepsilon\) turbulence model (cf. Subsection 7.2.2). The factors \(C_1\) to \(C_5\) in Eq. (7.30) are provided in Refs. [25], [30].
与线性涡黏性方法相比,非线性模型的计算代价只略微增大,但对复杂湍流的预测能力却有显著提高。en
In comparison to the linear eddy-viscosity approach, the non-linear models are computationally only slightly more expensive, but they offer a substantially improved prediction capabilities for complex turbulent flows.